The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 — commonly called DPDP — received Presidential assent on 11th August 2023. It is India’s first …

India’s most important data law is here. Does your IT team know what it means for them?

Important Update about Filing of AOC-4 and MGT-7

Relaxation on levy of additional fees is given till 15.03.2022 for filing of e-forms AOC-4, AOC-4 (CFS), AOC-4, AOC-4 XBRL AOC-4 Non-XBRL and 31.03.2022 for MGT-7/MGT-7A for the Financial Year 2020-21.

1. New updated Return will be implemented – Updated return can be filed within 2 years from the end of the Assessment year

2. Reduced MAT/AMT for Co-operatives – Reduce rate of Co-op Societies to 15% – The surcharge is reduced from 15% to 12% for those having income between Rs.1 Crore to Rs.10 Crore

3. The payment of annuity and lumpsum amount for Parents/Guardian is made availalble.

4. NPS Contribution – The tax deduction limit increased at par with Central Govt. Employees for state Govt. Employees

5. Incentives for start-up: Tax Incentive – Period extended till 31.3.2023

6. Manufacturing Companies – Commencement of production – Period extended till 31.03.2024

7. Virtual Digital Asset: 30% tax rate. Only Cost of acquisition can be deducted. No carry forward of loss. TDS implemented. 

8. LTCG Maximimum Surcharge capped to 15%

9. Surcharge/Cess on income is not allowable as expenditure

10. Undisclosed cannot be setoff against brought forward loss in case of search and survey cased

MSMEs such as Udyam, e-shram, NCS & Aseem portals will be inter-linked, their scope will be widened.

A fund with blended capital raised under co-investment model facilitated through NABARD to finance startups in agriculture & rural enterprises for farm produce value chain

ECLGS to be extended upto March 2023, guaranteed cover extended by another Rs 50,000 crore.

Focus areas of Budget

• PM Gati Shakti
• Inclusive Development
• Productivity Enhancement
• Sunrise Opportunities
• Energy Transition
• Climate Action
• Financing of investments

PM Gati Shakti – Will generate more job opportunities and econmic development

400 new-generation Vande Bharat trains will be developed and manufactured in next 3 years.

Rs 48, 000 crore is allotted for PM Awas Yojana

 CBIC had issued  a clarificatory  Circular (Circular No. 161/17/2021-GST dated 20-09-2021) on taxability of export of services by a subsidiary/ sister concern/ group concern. The question clarified by the department was regard to whether the subsidiary/ sister concern/ group concern will come uder the definition of merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8;

In the Circular, it’s clarified that, , supply of services by a subsidiary/ sister concern/ group concern, etc. of a foreign company, which is incorporated in India under the Companies Act, 2013, to the establishments of the said foreign company located outside India (incorporated outside India), would not be barred by the condition (v) of the sub-section (6) of the section 2(merely establishment of a distinct person)of the IGST Act 2017 for being considered              as export of services.

The entire text of the Circular is given below:

F. No. CBIC-20001/8/2021–GST

Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs GST Policy Wing

******

New Delhi, dated the 20^th September, 2021

To

The Pr. Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners / Principal Commissioners / Commissioners of Central Tax (All)

The Principal Directors General / Directors General (All) Madam/ Sir,

Subject: Clarification relating to export of services-condition (v) of section 2(6) of the IGST Act 2017–reg.

Various representations have been received citing ambiguity caused in interpretation of the Explanation 1 under section 8 of the IGST Act 2017 in relation to condition (v) of export of services as mentioned in sub-section (6) of the section 2 of the IGST Act 2017. Doubts have been raised whether the supply of service by a subsidiary/ sister concern/ group concern, etc. of a foreign company in India, which is incorporated under the laws in India, to the foreign company incorporated under laws of a country outside India, will hit by condition (v) of sub- section (6) of section 2 of IGST Act.

2. The matter has been examined. In view of the difficulties being faced by the trade and industry and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of the law across field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred by section 168 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act”), hereby clarifies the issue in succeeding paragraphs.

Relevant legal provisions:

3.1              The export of services has been defined in sub-section (6) of the section 2 of the IGST Act 2017 as under:

(6)  “export of services” means the supply of any service when,––

(i)  the supplier of service is located in India;

(ii)  the recipient of service is located outside India;

(iii)  the place of supply of service is outside India;

(iv)   the payment for such service has been received by the supplier of service in convertible foreign exchange; and

(v)     the supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8;

3.2              Explanation 1 of the Section 8 of the IGST Act provides for the conditions wherein establishments of a person would be treated as establishments of distinct persons, which is reproduced as under:

Explanation 1.––For the purposes of this Act, where a person has,––

(i)             an establishment in India and any other establishment outside India;

(ii)               an establishment in a State or Union territory and any other establishment outside that State or Union territory; or

(iii)            an establishment in a State or Union territory and any other establishment being a business vertical registered within that State or Union territory, then such establishments shall be treated as establishments of distinct persons.

As per the above Explanation, an establishment of a person in India and another establishment of the said person outside India are considered as establishments of distinct persons.

3.3              Reference is also invited to the Explanation 2 of Section 8 of IGST Act, which is reproduced below:

“Explanation 2.––A person carrying on a business through a branch or an agency or a representational office in any territory shall be treated as having an establishment in that territory.”

3.4              Reference is also invited to the definition of “person” as provided under CGST Act 2017, made applicable to IGST Act vide section 2(24) of IGST Act 2017. “Person” has been defined under sub-section (84) of the section 2 of the CGST Act 2017, as under:

(84)  “person” includes—

(a)  an individual;

(b)  a Hindu Undivided Family;

(c)  a company;

(d)  a firm;

(e)  a Limited Liability Partnership;

(f)   an association of persons or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, in India or outside India;

(g)   any corporation established by or under any Central Act, State Act or Provincial Act or a Government company as defined in clause (45) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013;

(h)    any body corporate incorporated by or under the laws of a country outside India;

(i)   a co-operative society registered under any law relating to co-operative societies;

(j)   a local authority;

(k)  Central Government or a State Government;

(l)   society as defined under the Societies Registration Act, 1860;

(m)   trust; and

(n)  every artificial juridical person, not falling within any of the above;

3.5.      The definitions of company and foreign company have been provided under section 2 of Companies Act 2013, as under:

(20) “company” means a company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law;

(42)  “foreign company” means any company or body corporate incorporated outside India which—

(a)  has a place of business in India whether by itself or through an agent, physically or through electronic mode; and

(b)  conducts any business activity in India in any other manner.

Analysis of the issue:

4.1              Clause (v) of sub-section (6) of section 2 of IGST Act, which defines “export of services”, places a condition that the services provided by one establishment of a person to another establishment of the same person, considered as establishments of distinct persons as per Explanation 1 of section 8 of IGST Act, cannot be treated as export. In other words, any supply of services by an establishment of a foreign company in India to any other establishment of the said foreign company outside India will not be covered under definition of export of services.

4.2              Further, perusal of the Explanation 2 to section 8 of the IGST Act suggests that if a foreign company is conducting business in India through a branch or an agency or a representational office, then the said branch or agency or representational office of the foreign company, located in India, shall be treated as establishment of the said foreign company in India. Similarly, if any company incorporated in India, is operating through a branch or an agency or a representational office in any country outside India, then that branch or agency or representational office shall be treated as the establishment of the said company in the said country.

4.3. In view of the above, it can be stated that supply of services made by a branch or an agency or representational office of a foreign company, not incorporated in India, to any establishment of the said foreign company outside India, shall be treated as supply between establishments of distinct persons and shall not be considered as “export of services” in view of condition (v) of sub-section (6) of section 2 of IGST Act. Similarly, any supply of service by a company incorporated in India to its branch or agency or representational office, located in any other country and not incorporated under the laws of the said country, shall also be considered as supply between establishments of distinct persons and cannot be treated as export of services.

4.4 From the perusal of the definition of “person” under sub-section (84) of section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the definitions of “company” and “foreign company” under Section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, it is observed that a company incorporated in India and a foreign company incorporated outside India, are separate “person” under the provisions of CGST Act and accordingly, are separate legal entities. Thus, a subsidiary/ sister concern/ group concern of any foreign company which is incorporated in India, then the said company incorporated in India will be considered as a separate “person” under the provisions of CGST Act and accordingly, would be considered as a separate legal entity than the foreign company.

Clarification:

5.1              In view of the above, it is clarified that a company incorporated in India and a body corporate incorporated by or under the laws of a country outside India, which is also referred to as foreign company under Companies Act, are separate persons under CGST Act, and thus are separate legal entities. Accordingly, these two separate persons would not be considered as “merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8”.

5.2              Therefore, supply of services by a subsidiary/ sister concern/ group concern, etc. of a foreign company, which is incorporated in India under the Companies Act, 2013 (and thus qualifies as a ‘company’ in India as per Companies Act), to the establishments of the said foreign company located outside India (incorporated outside India), would not be barred by the condition (v) of the sub-section (6) of the section 2 of the IGST Act 2017 for being considered as export of services, as it would not be treated as supply between merely establishments of distinct persons under Explanation 1 of section 8 of IGST Act 2017 . Similarly, the supply from a company incorporated in India to its related establishments outside India, which are incorporated under the laws outside India, would not be treated as supply to merely establishments of distinct person under Explanation 1 of section 8 of IGST Act 2017. Such supplies, therefore, would qualify as ‘export of services’, subject to fulfilment of other conditions as provided under sub-section (6) of section 2 of IGST Act.

6.                    It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this Circular.

7.                  Difficulty, if any, in the implementation of this Circular may be brought to the notice of the Board. Hindi version will follow.

(Sanjay Mangal)

Principal Commissioner